<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scripting languages are not the same as dynamic languages</title>
	<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/164</link>
	<description>marcoil's thoughts on programming</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guido van Rossum</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2714</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido van Rossum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2714</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should update the wikipedia entries then.

To me, "GvR repeats the confusion between X and Y" sounds like "GvR is wrong", and that's what I disagree with.  I am not wrong in making this distinction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should update the wikipedia entries then.</p>
<p>To me, &#8220;GvR repeats the confusion between X and Y&#8221; sounds like &#8220;GvR is wrong&#8221;, and that&#8217;s what I disagree with.  I am not wrong in making this distinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcoil</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>marcoil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>@Guido van Rossum: I would never call you "confused" in these matters, and I'm sorry if my wording led you to think that.

Still, I do think that two different language categories are generally "confused" while there are enough differences to maintain them apart. Not just in their programming environments, but also in the way they work.

I don't think I am "confused" in this matter either, although I'm clearly disagreeing with "how these terms are usually understood".

Once again, I'm sorry you took my dissenting opinion as a personal attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Guido van Rossum: I would never call you &#8220;confused&#8221; in these matters, and I&#8217;m sorry if my wording led you to think that.</p>
<p>Still, I do think that two different language categories are generally &#8220;confused&#8221; while there are enough differences to maintain them apart. Not just in their programming environments, but also in the way they work.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I am &#8220;confused&#8221; in this matter either, although I&#8217;m clearly disagreeing with &#8220;how these terms are usually understood&#8221;.</p>
<p>Once again, I&#8217;m sorry you took my dissenting opinion as a personal attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido van Rossum</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido van Rossum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>There's a distinction alright, but it's not between scripting and dynamic languages. Their definitions in wikipedia match how these terms are usually understood: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scripting_language vs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming_language .

The distinction you are trying to make is more between languages with a big programming environment built in (Smalltalk, many Lisp systems) vs. (more traditional) languages with external programming environments (Java, some Lisps, most other languages).

I think you owe me an apology for claiming that I am "repeating a confusion." I know perfectly well what I am talking about, and most people would agree with my terminology. You are the one who is "confused".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a distinction alright, but it&#8217;s not between scripting and dynamic languages. Their definitions in wikipedia match how these terms are usually understood: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scripting_language" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scripting_language</a> vs. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming_language" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming_language</a> .</p>
<p>The distinction you are trying to make is more between languages with a big programming environment built in (Smalltalk, many Lisp systems) vs. (more traditional) languages with external programming environments (Java, some Lisps, most other languages).</p>
<p>I think you owe me an apology for claiming that I am &#8220;repeating a confusion.&#8221; I know perfectly well what I am talking about, and most people would agree with my terminology. You are the one who is &#8220;confused&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcoil</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>marcoil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>@Guido van Rossum: I agree the distinction is not generally recognized, that's why I'm making it. 

The names I've used are possibly not the best, but I do think there's a real difference on how Lisp and Smalltalk worked when compared to languages like Python or Perl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Guido van Rossum: I agree the distinction is not generally recognized, that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m making it. </p>
<p>The names I&#8217;ve used are possibly not the best, but I do think there&#8217;s a real difference on how Lisp and Smalltalk worked when compared to languages like Python or Perl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido van Rossum</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido van Rossum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>I don't believe this distinction is generally agreed upon. Can you show some references (e.g. Wikipedia) and examples of languages that are scripting and languages that are dynamic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe this distinction is generally agreed upon. Can you show some references (e.g. Wikipedia) and examples of languages that are scripting and languages that are dynamic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

